Fred Aristotle Davis, Jr v. CHARLENE DAY, Assistant Public Defender, Com- monwealth of Virginia

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6176
FRED ARISTOTLE DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLENE DAY, Assistant Public Defender, Com-
monwealth of Virginia; DAVID HICKS, Common-
wealth Attorney for Commonwealth of Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-00-627-3)
Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fred Aristotle Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Fred Aristotle Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Day, No. CA-00-627-3
(E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --