The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6167•Jerry L. Lindsey v. Lieutenant Feickert
01-6167Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6167
JERRY L. LINDSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT FEICKERT; CAPTAIN BOYLES; SERGEANT
DANIELS; SERGEANT QUINN; OFFICER PHILLIPS;
OFFICER CARPENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-815-5-BR)
Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry L. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry L. Lindsey appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See Lindsey v. Feickert, No. CA-00-815-5-BR
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.