The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6157•Jiame J. Hargrove v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CA-00-1400-AM
01-6157Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6157
JIAME J. HARGROVE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DENNIS HARRISON, JR., Warden; MICHAEL GAINES,
United States Parole Commissioner,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-1400-AM)
Submitted: May 24, 2001 Decided: June 1, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jiame J. Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Erwin Peabody, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jiame J. Hargrove appeals the district court order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) petition.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Hargrove v. Harrison, No. CA-00-1400-AM
(E.D. Va. filed: December 14, 2000; entered: Dec. 18, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.