The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6116•Donald Carr v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CA-00-2071-AM
01-6116Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6116
DONALD CARR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ADRIENNE POTEAT, Warden; MICHAEL GAINES,
United States Parole Commission Chairman,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-2071-AM)
Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: October 1, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Carr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Carr appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Carr v. Poteat, No. CA-00-2071-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2000). We
grant Carr’s motion to amend his informal brief to correct a typo-
graphical error, and the corrected pages have been filed. We deny
his motion for a preliminary injunction and his request for a cer-
tificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.