The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-4991•United States of America v. Timothy Edward Simms, a/k/a DeNasty
01-4991Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4991
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY EDWARD SIMMS, a/k/a DeNasty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CR-97-355-WMN)
Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: November 8, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Montemarano, MICHAEL D. MONTEMARANO, P.A., Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellant. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Simms appeals his 240 month sentence entered after
remand for resentencing on his conviction for conspiracy to
distribute narcotics, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and
aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000). The
Government has filed a motion which we construe as one for summary
affirmance.
We grant the Government’s motion for summary affirmance. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.