The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-4760•United States of America v. Kedrick Frank O’meara
01-4760Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4760
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KEDRICK FRANK O’MEARA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-91-44)
Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: October 2, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael R. Cline, MICHAEL R. CLINE LAW OFFICE, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney,
Charles T. Miller, First Assistant United States Attorney, Andrew
R. Cogar, Third Year Law Student, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kendrick O’Meara appeals the district court’s order granting
the Government’s motion to revoke O’Meara’s conditional release and
denying O’Meara’s motion that he be unconditionally released from
both federal and state custody. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion, and we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. O’Meara, No. CR-91-44 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 7, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.