The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-4074•United States of America v. Mark Paul Sarno
01-4074Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 10, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4074
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARK PAUL SARNO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-99-58, CR-99-134, CR-99-135)
Submitted: August 28, 2001 Decided: October 10, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Paul Sarno, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Patrick Auld, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Paul Sarno appeals from the district court’s order af-
firming the magistrate judge’s order denying Sarno’s motion for the
magistrate judge to recuse himself from all further proceedings.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Sarno, Nos. CR-99-58; CR-
99-134; CR-99-135 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.