Jack N. Luck; Jennie D. Luck; William C. Luck v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . We…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2501
JACK N. LUCK; JENNIE D. LUCK; WILLIAM C. LUCK,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DONALD A. DAVID;
THOMAS P. GOURLEY; THOMAS A. SLATE; ANN
VENEMAN, Secretary of United States Department
of Agriculture,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.
(CA-01-16-6)
Submitted: February 27, 2002 Decided: March 15, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack N. Luck, Jennie D. Luck, William C. Luck, Appellants Pro Se.
Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Vir-
ginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jack N. Luck, Jennie D. Luck, and William C. Luck appeal the
district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss
their action filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA),
28 U.S.C.A. § 1346 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), and Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and final order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Luck v. United
States, No. CA-01-16-6 (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2001). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --