In re: Andrew Clifford Moore

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2497
In Re: ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE,
Debtor.
GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT,
Appellant,
versus
ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE,
Appellee,
and
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
Party-in-interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95-
3904-MJG, BK-88-42746-PM)
Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 1, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janet Marsha Nesse, RILEY & ARTABANE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
George E. McDermott appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3), to reopen
a case in the district court due to fraud. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of
discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See McDermott v. Moore, Nos. CA-
95-3904-MJG; BK-88-42746-PM (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --