The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2495•Leonard A. Lyles v. GEORGE BALOG, Commissioner
01-2495Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2495
LEONARD A. LYLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE BALOG, Commissioner,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99-
3084-MJG)
Submitted: April 29, 2002 Decided: June 3, 2002
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard A. Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. Allyson Murphy Huey, OFFICE OF
THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Leonard A. Lyles appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Appellees on his religious
discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lyles v. Balog, No.
CA-99-3084-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.