The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2425•H&wfresh Seafoods, Incorporated v. Lewis Schulman
01-2425Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2425
H&W FRESH SEAFOODS, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LEWIS SCHULMAN,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
SCOTT TAYLOR; HEWS SEAFOOD, INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
98-3851-CCB)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 22, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lewis Schulman, Appellant Pro Se. John Stephen Simms, GREBER &
SIMMS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lewis Schulman appeals from the district court’s order de-
clining to reconsider the denial of Schulman’s motion to vacate the
default judgment entered against him. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. H&W
Fresh Seafoods, Inc. v. Schulman, No. CA-98-3851-CCB (D. Md. July
12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.