The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2391•Jacob Wearing v. Bovis & Lend Lease, Incorporated
01-2391Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2391
JACOB WEARING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOVIS & LEND LEASE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-00-880-5-H-3)
Submitted: May 14, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacob Wearing, Appellant Pro Se. Nigle Bruce Barrow, Jr., Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jacob Wearing appeals the district court’s orders denying his
motion for a permanent injunction and granting Defendant’s motion
for summary judgment in this employment action. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Wearing v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., No. CA-00-880-5-H-3
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 23 & Nov. 15, 2001). We deny Wearing’s motions for
a default judgment, to deny Defendant response, and for relief
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(c). Finally, we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.