The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2366•Vivien Newton v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. MISC-01-23 E.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2001
01-2366Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2366
VIVIEN NEWTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(MISC-01-23)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vivien Newton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vivien Newton appeals from the district court’s order denying
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Newton v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. MISC-01-23 (E.D. Va. filed
Oct. 26, 2001; entered Nov. 7, 2001). We deny Newton’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.