Vivien Newton v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. MISC-01-23 E.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2001

01-2366Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2366
VIVIEN NEWTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(MISC-01-23)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vivien Newton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Vivien Newton appeals from the district court’s order denying
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Newton v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. MISC-01-23 (E.D. Va. filed
Oct. 26, 2001; entered Nov. 7, 2001). We deny Newton’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.