The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2358•Anthony Lambert, Sr v. Edward E. Webb, individually
01-2358Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2358
ANTHONY LAMBERT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDWARD E. WEBB, individually and in his
official capacity as Sheriff of Gates County,
North Carolina; KEVIN L. BYRD, individually
and in his official capacity as Sergeant of
Gates County, North Carolina; GATES COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA; GATES COUNTY DEFENDANTS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND;
E. W. Jones, individually,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,
Chief District Judge. (CA-00-60-2-BO)
Submitted: April 24, 2002 Decided: May 20, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Anthony Lambert, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, Tamara
Paragino Williams Desai, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Lambert, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion to remand the action to state court and
dismissing the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b), 41(b). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Lambert v. Webb, No. CA-00-60-2-BO (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 13, 2001; Sept. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.