The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2351•William Lee Richardson, Jr v. Social Security Administration
01-2351Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2351
WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; THE CITY PO-
LICE DEPARTMENT OF CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-779-2)
Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson
v. Social Sec. Admin., No. CA-01-779-2 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 31, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.