The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2264•William Lee Richardson, Jr v. F
01-2264Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2264
WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
F AND M BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin,
District Judge. (CA-01-721-2)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: December 27, 2001
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathy Santa Barbara,
LAYVA, BITTORF & SANTA BARBARA, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Richardson’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss this appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Richardson v. F and M Bank, No. CA-01-721-2 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 10,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.