Cecil Alan Hill v. Pitt-Ohio Express, Incorporated

01-2261Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 21, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2261
CECIL ALAN HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PITT-OHIO EXPRESS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-00-1219)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cecil Alan Hill, Appellant Pro Se. John R. Hoblitzell, KAY, CASTO
& CHANEY, Charleston, West Virginia; Sidney R. Steinberg, Ruth R.
Schwartz, POST & SCHELL, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Cecil Alan Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his wrongful termination action. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v.
Pitt-Ohio Express, Inc., No. CA-00-1219 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 20,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.