The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2213•David P. Farley v. CHARLES F. MCDARRIS, Attorney for C.A.S.A
01-2213Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2213
DAVID P. FARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES F. MCDARRIS, Attorney for C.A.S.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-580-5-BO)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David P. Farley, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000) and
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinions and find that this appeal
is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See Farley v. McDarris, No. CA-01-580-5-BO
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 20 & Sept. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.