Jessie Royster v. Nelson, II, Gina Janeiro Lisher, MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.,…

01-2193Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 16, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2193
JESSIE ROYSTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NHP MANAGEMENT COMPANY; APARTMENT INVESTMENT &
MANAGEMENT COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-
290-L)
Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: May 16, 2002
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edith A. Lawson-Jackson, E. A. LAWSON-JACKSON & ASSOCIATES, Bowie,
Maryland, for Appellant. Jonathan W. Greenbaum, Adrian V. Nelson,
II, Gina Janeiro Lisher, MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY &
POPEO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jessie Royster appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendants in this action brought pursuant to
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and 42
U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Royster v. NHP Management Co., No. CA-00-290-L (D. Md. Sept.
13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.