The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2145•John Jeter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
01-2145Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2145
JOHN JETER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 99-15017)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Jeter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Farber, Marion Elizabeth
Erickson, Patricia McDonald Bowman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Jeter appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of a deficiency in
his 1997 personal income taxes. We have reviewed the record and
the tax court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Jeter v. Comm’r of
Internal Revenue, No. 99-15017 (U.S.T.C. Aug. 14, 2001 & Sept. 5,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.