The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2129•Brian E. Peltier v. Greyhound Lines, Incorporated
01-2129Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2129
BRIAN E. PELTIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-00-1726-2-18AJ)
Submitted: December 28, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2002
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian E. Peltier, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown, YOUNG,
CLEMENT, RIVERS & TISDALE, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brian E. Peltier appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to his former employer in his civil action in
which he alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act
and the Family Medical Leave Act. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s re-
port and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Peltier v.
Greyhound Lines, Inc., No. CA-00-1726-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 7, 2001).
We also deny Peltier’s motion for formal briefing. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.