The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2119•Henry L. Smith, Jr v. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
01-2119Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 25, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2119
HENRY L. SMITH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-572-BO)
Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 25, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry L. Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henry L. Smith, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his employment discrimination action for failing to
timely pursue equal employment opportunity (EEO) counseling. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Smith v. Henderson, No. CA-00-572-BO (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.