The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2065•In re: MUZIO ROBERTO; In Re: MARY K. ROBERTO
01-2065Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2065
In Re: MUZIO ROBERTO; In Re: MARY K. ROBERTO,
Debtors.
MUZIO ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-01-78-AW)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muzio Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Muzio Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district
court’s order denying their motion to reconsider a prior order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of their Chapter 13
petition. Our review of the record and the district court’s opin-
ion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Roberto v. United States Trustee,
No. CA-01-78-AW (D. Md. filed July 23, 2001, entered July 24,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.