Muzio B. Roberto v. ROSALYN BELL, Circuit Court Judge, Montgomery County, Maryland

01-2034Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2034
MUZIO B. ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
ROSALYN BELL, Circuit Court Judge, Montgomery
County, Maryland; VINCENT FERRETTI, Circuit
Court Judge, Montgomery County, Maryland; ANN
HARRINGTON, Circuit Court Judge, Montgomery
County, Maryland; PAUL WEINSTEIN, Circuit
Court Judge, Montgomery County, Maryland;
LOUISE SCRIVNER, Circuit Court Judge, Mont-
gomery County, Maryland,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-00-1438-AW)
Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muzio B. Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Muzio B. Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district
court’s order denying their motion to reconsider a prior order
dismissing their civil action against several Maryland state court
judges. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Roberto v. Bell, No. CA-00-1438-
AW (D. Md. July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.