The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2022•Kathleen A. Miller v. Richard Danzig, Secretary of the Navy
01-2022Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2022
KATHLEEN A. MILLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-422-2)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathleen A. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen A. Miller appeals the district court’s order entering
judgment as a matter of law in favor of the Secretary of the Navy
on her claims of discrimination and retaliation in violation of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-797 (West 1999 &
Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Danzig, No. CA-00-
422-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 14, 2001; entered June 15, 2001). We
deny Miller’s motion to stay the case. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.