The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1961•John Van B. Metts, Iii v. North Carolina Department of Revenue
01-1961Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1961
JOHN VAN B. METTS, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-42-78-BR(1))
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Van B. Metts, III, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith,
Assistant Attorney General, K. Naomi Kim, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Van B. Metts, III, appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing his suit under the Americans with Disabilities
Act, as well as various preliminary rulings. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Metts v. North Carolina Dep’t of Revenue, No. CA-00-42-78-
BR(1) (E.D.N.C. Jan. 18 & July 2, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.