The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1933•Michael A. Scott v. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr
01-1933Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1933
MICHAEL A. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HENRY COKE MORGAN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-00-895-2)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Scott appeals the district court judgment granting
Judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.’s motion to dismiss for failing to
state a claim and dismissing the complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Scott v. Morgan, CA-00-895-2 (E.D. Va. May 25,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.