John N. Atkinson v. City of Spartanburg

01-1905Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1905
JOHN N. ATKINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF SPARTANBURG; ANTHONY T. FISHER; ART D.
LITTLEJOHN; SPARTANBURG CIVIL SERVICE COMMIS-
SION; SPARTANBURG PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT;
SPARTANBURG PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT, Office
of Professional Standards; SPARTANBURG PUBLIC
SAFETY DEPARTMENT, Incident Review Board,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-1179-7-BG)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John N. Atkinson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Howard Keim, Jr.,
Jeffrey Andrew Lehrer, EDWARDS, BALLARD, BISHOP, STURM, CLARK &
KEIM, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John N. Atkinson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Atkinson v. City of Spartanburg, No. CA-00-1179-7-BG (D.S.C. June
12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.