The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1897•Delores A. Frye v. Pulte Corporation
01-1897Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1897
DELORES A. FRYE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PULTE CORPORATION; PULTE HOME CORPORATION,
d/b/a Stoneridge Builders and Developers,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STONERIDGE BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-00-905-A)
Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Delores A. Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Steven William Ray, Michelle B.
Radcliffe, RAY & ISLER, P.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Delores A. Frye appeals from the district court’s order deny-
ing her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Frye v. Pulte Corp., No. CA-00-905-A (E.D. Va. filed June 21, 2001;
entered June 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.