The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1860•SHERMAN B. LUBMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Denise J. Leclair
01-1860Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1860
SHERMAN B. LUBMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DENISE J. LECLAIR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-00-448, BK-98-35239-T, AP-99-3175-T)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Denise J. LeClair, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Allan Lake, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Denise J. LeClair appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing, as untimely, her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order
granting the bankruptcy trustee’s motion for default judgment and
denying her a discharge in bankruptcy. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Lubman v. LeClair, Nos. CA-00-448; BK-98-35239-T; AP-99-3175-T
(E.D. Va. June 15, 2001). We deny Appellee’s motion for sanctions.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.