The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1848•Cleo M. Clark v. Greensville Memorial Hospital/emporia Hospital Corporation
01-1848Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1848
CLEO M. CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREENSVILLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL/EMPORIA HOSPITAL
CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-00-403)
Submitted: December 26, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleo M. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Skeirik Elliott, MCCANDLISH
KAIN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cleo M. Clark appeals from the district court’s order adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation that summary judgment be
granted in favor of Greensville Memorial in Clark’s action alleging
racially motivated employment discrimination. We have reviewed the
record, the district court’s opinion, and the magistrate judge’s
report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v.
Greensville Mem’l Hosp., No. CA-00-403 (E.D. Va. May 24, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.