The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1837•Samuel Blackburn v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General
01-1837Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1837
SAMUEL BLACKBURN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General; HAROLD
WANKEL; STEPHEN H. GREENE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-00-1522-A)
Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001
Before WILLIAMS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Blackburn, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, Rachel Celia
Ballow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Blackburn appeals from the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment for the Defendants on his employment dis-
crimination complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Blackburn v. Ashcroft, No. CA-00-1522-A
(E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2001 & filed June 7, 2001; entered June 8, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.