The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1830•Doris Neill Mozley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
01-1830Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1830
DORIS NEILL MOZLEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 00-4865)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doris Neill Mozley, Appellant Pro Se. David English Carmack, Janet
A. Bradley, Tamara Wenda Ashford, Paula Marie Junghans, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown,
Richard W. Skillman, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Doris Mozley appeals from the tax court’s order determining
deficiencies with respect to her 1995 and 1996 federal income tax
liability. Our review of the record and the tax court’s opinion
discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-
soning of the tax court. Mozley v. Commissioner, No. 00-4865 (U.S.
Tax Ct. May 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.