Edward Junior Clark v. Queen City Recovery

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1777
EDWARD JUNIOR CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
QUEEN CITY RECOVERY; CARLYLE BRITT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-372-3-MU)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Edward Junior Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Bland, WEAVER,
BENNETT & BLAND, P.A., Matthews, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Junior Clark appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Clark v. Queen City Recovery, No. CA-00-
372-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 9 & 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --