McDonald’s Corporation v. Dat Do

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1766
MCDONALD’S CORPORATION,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAT DO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-00-1592-A)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dat Do, Appellant Pro Se. David Harold Dickieson, BUCHANAN
INGERSOLL, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dat Do appeals from the district court’s order granting
McDonald’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
McDonald’s Corp. v. Do, No. CA-00-1592-A (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30,
2001; entered May 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --