United States of America v. Richard L. Bradley

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1757
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD L. BRADLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (CA-00-12-3)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard L. Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Richard L. Bradley appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration challenging service of
process. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bradley, No. CA-
00-12-3 (W.D. Va. May 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --