The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1709•Ned L. Parker, Jr v. City of Charleston Police Department
01-1709Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 19, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1709
NED L. PARKER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, District Judge.
(CA-00-965-2-12)
Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 19, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ned L. Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ned L. Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Parker v. City of Charleston Police Dep’t, No.
CA-00-965-2-12 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.