The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1683•Elicia D. Pledger v. Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters
01-1683Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1683
ELICIA D. PLEDGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF THE KING’S DAUGHTERS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-720-2)
Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elicia D. Pledger, Appellant Pro Se. William McCardell Furr,
WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West Supp. 2001).
2
PER CURIAM:
Elicia D. Pledger seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order
granting summary judgment to the employer in Pledger’s civil action
alleging employment discrimination. * We have reviewed the record
and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order for the reasons
as stated from the bench. See Pledger v. Children’s Hosp. of the
King’s Daughters, No. CA-00-720-2 (E.D. Va. May 4, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.