The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1625•Jessie B. Hayes v. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General
01-1625Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 14, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1625
JESSIE B. HAYES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General;
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-00-2027-2-18AJ)
Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie B. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jessie B. Hayes appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Hayes v. Henderson, No. CA-00-2027-2-18AJ (D.S.C. filed
Apr. 5, 2000; entered Apr. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.