Rodney L. Cherry v. City of Wilson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1599
RODNEY L. CHERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF WILSON; WILSON POLICE DEPARTMENT;
D. H. GARRIS, Officer; S. L. GARDNER, Officer;
WILLIE WILLIAMS, Chief,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-1674
RODNEY L. CHERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DORIS JONES, National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People; NATIONAL ASSO-
CIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-01-43-4-H, CA-01-44-4-H)
Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 10, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney L. Cherry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Rodney L. Cherry appeals the district court’s orders dismiss-
ing his civil actions as frivolous. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinions which have been consolidated on
appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Cherry
v. City of Wilson, No. CA-01-43-4-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2001);
Cherry v. Jones, No. CA-01-44-4-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2001). To the
extent it is unclear, we note that the court’s dismissals are to be
without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1996). Cherry’s “motion for
remand” is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --