George H. Seymour v. W. ANDREW REESE, M.D., Individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1570
GEORGE H. SEYMOUR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. ANDREW REESE, M.D., Individually and in his
capacity as Medical Director of the Pamunkey
Regional Jail,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-687-3)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Gregory Crowley, CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellant. Lynne Jones Blain, Jeremy D. Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR,
CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George H. Seymour appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant in this 42 U.S.C.A.
§ 1983 (West Supp. 2001) action in which Seymour asserted that the
Defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical
needs. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix,
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Seymour v. Reese, No. CA-00-687-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --