Rose Mary Byrd v. Kemet Electronics Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1555
ROSE MARY BYRD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KEMET ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-3548-6-20BG)
Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 28, 2001
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rose Mary Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Oliver King, OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rose Mary Byrd appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her complaint alleging racial and age discrimination in violation
of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e (West 1994 & Supp. 2000), and the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. § 621, et
seq. (West 1999 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Byrd
v. Kemet Electronics Corp., No. CA-00-3548-6-20BG (D.S.C. Apr. 4,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --