The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1548•David William Harris v. Drug Enforcement Administration
01-1548Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 16, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1548
DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(CA-00-3716-JFM)
Submitted: February 22, 2002 Decided: April 16, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David William Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David W. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil action seeking return of currency that was
administratively forfeited to the United States. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Harris v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. CA-00-3716-JFM
(D. Md. Mar. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.