The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1535•T. James Anderson, Jr v. WILLIAM S. HORNE, Judge, Talbot County Circuit Court
01-1535Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 8, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1535
T. JAMES ANDERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM S. HORNE, Judge, Talbot County Circuit
Court,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-912-
AMD)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
T. James Anderson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
T. James Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (West Supp. 2000). We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Anderson v. Horne, No. CA-912-AMD (D. Md. Mar.
29 & 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.