The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1494•Arthur Jay Hirsch v. Dean W. Withers
01-1494Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 8, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1494
ARTHUR JAY HIRSCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEAN W. WITHERS; FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK OF
TIMBERVILLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-98-5)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Jay Hirsch, Appellant Pro Se. David Alvin Penrod, HOOVER,
PENROD, DAVENPORT & CRIST, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Jay Hirsch appeals the district court’s order dismiss-
ing his civil complaint. Our review of the record and the district
court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hirsch v. Withers,
No. CA-00-98-5 (W.D. Va. March 9, 2001). We deny Hirsch’s motion
for declaratory judgment and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.