The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1492•In re: Linda L. King
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1492
In Re: LINDA L. KING,
Debtor.
LINDA L. KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IRVING EVANS; GARNET EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ELLEN W. COSBY,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
01-33, CA-01-34, BK-00-2078-5-JS)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 25, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Linda L. King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Linda L. King appeals from the district court’s orders dis-
missing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order for failure to
comply with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009(a), and denying her motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s orders and find no reversible error and no abuse of discre-
tion. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); In re Serra Builders, Inc.,
970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. King v. Evans, Nos. CA-01-33; CA-
01-34; BK-00-2078-5-JS (D. Md. Mar. 16, 2001 & Mar. 26, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.