The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1491•Stephen T. Vogrin v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
01-1491Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 3, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1491
STEPHEN T. VOGRIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-117-5)
Submitted: June 20, 2001 Decided: July 3, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen T. Vogrin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael C. Colville, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Colette
Gianna Matzzie, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen T. Vogrin appeals the district court’s order granting
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms’ motion to dismiss. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opin-
ion and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. See Vogrin v. Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, No. CA-98-117-5 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.