Tammy Jayne Graham v. Diabetes Self Care, Incorporated

01-1415Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 12, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1415
TAMMY JAYNE GRAHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DIABETES SELF CARE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1416
KAREN R. BARGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DIABETES SELF CARE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-98-633-7, CA-98-785-7)
Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robyn B. Bennitt, BENNITT & BENNITT, Birmingham, Alabama, for
Appellants. Neal S. Johnson, LICHTENSTEIN, FISHWICK & JOHNSON,
P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Tammy J. Graham and Karen R.
Barger sued Diabetes Self Care, Inc. (DSC), their former employer.
Graham alleged violation of the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C.A.
§ 206(d)(1) (West 1998). Barger alleged violation of the Equal Pay
Act; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-
634 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001); and Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001).
The district court granted summary judgment to DSC in both actions.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court in each case. United States v. Graham, No.
CA-98-633-7 (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 20, 2001; entered Feb. 21, 2001);
United States v. Barger, No. CA-98-785-7 (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 20,
2001; entered Feb. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
No. 01-1415 - AFFIRMED
No. 01-1416 - AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.