Ricky Hagenbuch v. Compaq Computer Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1405
RICKY HAGENBUCH; CATHY HAGENBUCH; RICKY
HAGENBUCH BUILDING CONTRACTOR, INCORPORATED;
HEALTHFUL LIVING,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION; SBC COMMUNICA-
TIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Southwestern Bell
Telephone Company; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
COMPANY; SOUTHWESTERN BELL INTERNET SERVICES,
INCORPORATED, d/b/a SBC Internet Services,
Incorporated; PACIFIC BELL INTERNET SERVICES;
SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, a/k/a
ASI,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
AMERITECH, INCORPORATED; DSL TECHNOLOGIES,
INCORPORATED; ASI COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-00-2073-A)
Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 16, 2001

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen R. Palmer, STEPHEN R. PALMER, ESQ., P.C., Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellants. Kent A. Gardiner, Christopher J. Huber,
James C. Cooper, CROWELL & MORING, L.L.P., Washington, D.C.; Emily
M. Yinger, James S. Rixse, HOGAN & HARTSON, L.L.P., McLean,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court’s order dismissing
their civil complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Our review of the record included on appeal and
the parties’ briefs discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hagenbuch v. Compaq
Computer Corp., No. CA-00-2073-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 7, 2001;
entered Feb. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --