Joyce S. Kimble v. Montgomery County Board of Education

01-1396Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1396
JOYCE S. KIMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; MONT-
GOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MONTGOMERY
COUNTY GOVERNMENT; JERRY WEAST, Doctor, Super-
intendent Montgomery County Public Schools;
PAUL VANCE, Doctor, Superintendent, District
of Columbia Public Schools; KATHERINE GUTTER-
MAN; ANN KAMENSTEIN; GARY LEVINE; ELIZABETH
ARONS, Doctor; RAY WHITE; FRED S. EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
00-234-PJM)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joyce S. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se. Linda B. Thall, Senior Assis-
tant County Attorney, Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, Assistant County
Attorney, Joanne Robertson, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville,
Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Joyce S. Kimble appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Kimble v. Montgomery County Bd. of Educ.,
No. CA-00-234-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.